VSK TN
Hon Supreme Court terms 4.5% Muslim Quota
‘Unconstitutional’
‘Unconstitutional’
Dr Togadia warns of stir
against Constitutional Amendment if any for Muslim Quota
against Constitutional Amendment if any for Muslim Quota
New Delhi, June 13, 2012 VHP Press Release: In a landmark rendition today the
Hon Supreme Court of India warned the Union Govt that it could even reject
admitting its appeal challenging Andhra High Court decision to reject 4.5%
Muslim Quota from OBC 27%. The Union Govt had filed the reports of Sachhar
Committee & Rangnath Mishr Commission & other sundry reports as the basis
for the 4.5% Muslim quota. The Hon Supreme Court refused to accept these
reports. The Hon Supreme Court has also refused to stay the Andhra HC decision
to cancel 4.5% Muslim Quota.
Hon Supreme Court of India warned the Union Govt that it could even reject
admitting its appeal challenging Andhra High Court decision to reject 4.5%
Muslim Quota from OBC 27%. The Union Govt had filed the reports of Sachhar
Committee & Rangnath Mishr Commission & other sundry reports as the basis
for the 4.5% Muslim quota. The Hon Supreme Court refused to accept these
reports. The Hon Supreme Court has also refused to stay the Andhra HC decision
to cancel 4.5% Muslim Quota.
The Hon Supreme Court said, “The Govt’s
decision to implement 4.5% sub-quota from January this year did not prima facie
appear to be supported by constitutional provisions… The December 22, 2011
office memorandum on the issue of sub-quota did not have the legislative
support. Unlike the 27% to OBCs in central education institutions, the carving
of 4.5% sub-quota is not supported by even a law. It also appears that the
carving of 4.5% sub-quota was purely based on religious considerations. We are
not inclined to grant stay.” The Hon Supreme Court also specifically asked the
Govt, ”You are giving them from 50%, you are giving them already from 27% OBC
& now you want to give them specially 4.5% exclusive. Why this religion
based discrimination?” Govt had no reply to such a direct question on triple
reservation to Muslims.
decision to implement 4.5% sub-quota from January this year did not prima facie
appear to be supported by constitutional provisions… The December 22, 2011
office memorandum on the issue of sub-quota did not have the legislative
support. Unlike the 27% to OBCs in central education institutions, the carving
of 4.5% sub-quota is not supported by even a law. It also appears that the
carving of 4.5% sub-quota was purely based on religious considerations. We are
not inclined to grant stay.” The Hon Supreme Court also specifically asked the
Govt, ”You are giving them from 50%, you are giving them already from 27% OBC
& now you want to give them specially 4.5% exclusive. Why this religion
based discrimination?” Govt had no reply to such a direct question on triple
reservation to Muslims.
VHP International Working President Dr Pravin
Togadia said, “This vindicates our stand strongly that any type of Muslim
quota is unconstitutional. The Hon Supreme Court terming Govt move of 4.5% to
Muslims from poor OBC 27% as ‘Unconstitutional’, ‘Not Supported by Law’ &
‘Purely Religious Consideration’ exposes Govt ulterior motive to discriminate
against Hindus for Muslims through the dubious studies like Sachhar Committee
& Rangnath Mishr Commission etc.”
Togadia said, “This vindicates our stand strongly that any type of Muslim
quota is unconstitutional. The Hon Supreme Court terming Govt move of 4.5% to
Muslims from poor OBC 27% as ‘Unconstitutional’, ‘Not Supported by Law’ &
‘Purely Religious Consideration’ exposes Govt ulterior motive to discriminate
against Hindus for Muslims through the dubious studies like Sachhar Committee
& Rangnath Mishr Commission etc.”
Dr Togadia further demanded an
unconditional & immediate apology from the Union Govt & from all the
state Govts who gave any reservations or special favours to Muslims. He also
demanded that the Govt now immediately withdraw reports of Sachhar Committee
& Rangnath Mishr Commission as the Hon Supreme Court has already rejected
them & Delhi HC had termed them unconstitutional.”
unconditional & immediate apology from the Union Govt & from all the
state Govts who gave any reservations or special favours to Muslims. He also
demanded that the Govt now immediately withdraw reports of Sachhar Committee
& Rangnath Mishr Commission as the Hon Supreme Court has already rejected
them & Delhi HC had termed them unconstitutional.”
Dr Togadia warned, “Rather than giving up the
unlawful, unconstitutional & discriminatory efforts of giving special
reservations & other favours to Muslims now, if the Govt goes ahead with
the vicious anti-national plan to amend the Constitution to yet give such
reservations & favours to Muslims, then Bharat’s Hindus of all castes will
protest as ONE democratically on the streets. All responsibility of any ensuing
situation thereafter will be the sole liability of the Union Govt.”
unlawful, unconstitutional & discriminatory efforts of giving special
reservations & other favours to Muslims now, if the Govt goes ahead with
the vicious anti-national plan to amend the Constitution to yet give such
reservations & favours to Muslims, then Bharat’s Hindus of all castes will
protest as ONE democratically on the streets. All responsibility of any ensuing
situation thereafter will be the sole liability of the Union Govt.”
Dr Togadia appealed to all in Bharat to challenge
in the respective courts all such special reservations & favours showered
on Muslims in any form anywhere in Bharat in all states including special
salary of Rs 2500 to Imams in Bengal; quota to Muslims in Tamil Nadu, Karnatak,
Bengal etc; fees paid by Govt of 72,09,000 Muslim students; monthly Ru 12,000
scholarship to 32,145 Muslim students (total Rs 700 Crore); educational loans
to Muslims at 3% & many other favours given through NMDC (National Minority
Development Corporation); Rs 1, 43, 396 Crore loan to Muslims for businesses at
the rate of 6% interest in priority sector lending per RBI circular while 13%
interest levied on Hindus etc. Dr Togadia appealed all to write letters /
emails to the PM, the Hon Supreme Court & the UN Human Rights against all
such unconstitutional, anti-law & discriminatory favors & reservations
given to Muslims.
in the respective courts all such special reservations & favours showered
on Muslims in any form anywhere in Bharat in all states including special
salary of Rs 2500 to Imams in Bengal; quota to Muslims in Tamil Nadu, Karnatak,
Bengal etc; fees paid by Govt of 72,09,000 Muslim students; monthly Ru 12,000
scholarship to 32,145 Muslim students (total Rs 700 Crore); educational loans
to Muslims at 3% & many other favours given through NMDC (National Minority
Development Corporation); Rs 1, 43, 396 Crore loan to Muslims for businesses at
the rate of 6% interest in priority sector lending per RBI circular while 13%
interest levied on Hindus etc. Dr Togadia appealed all to write letters /
emails to the PM, the Hon Supreme Court & the UN Human Rights against all
such unconstitutional, anti-law & discriminatory favors & reservations
given to Muslims.
Recently the Govt has sent a letter to all state
Govts asking them to appoint Muslim Police Inspectors in Muslim areas. This
also is an unconstitutional decision & must be challenged as this is a
prelude to the Targeted Violence Bill that the Govt has been proposing for
pushing Hindus to jail while protecting Muslim violence against all others.
Govts asking them to appoint Muslim Police Inspectors in Muslim areas. This
also is an unconstitutional decision & must be challenged as this is a
prelude to the Targeted Violence Bill that the Govt has been proposing for
pushing Hindus to jail while protecting Muslim violence against all others.
Dr Togadia also demanded that the Hon Election
Commission now must cancel registrations of all political parties that fought
or won the elections promising any type of Muslim quota / reservations /
special favours. The EC should also bar from such candidates from further
elections.
Commission now must cancel registrations of all political parties that fought
or won the elections promising any type of Muslim quota / reservations /
special favours. The EC should also bar from such candidates from further
elections.