VSK TN
OPEN LETTER TO POPE FRANCIS
Respected Holy
Father,
Father,
Great hope for a
positive change in the Catholic Church is pinned on the Your Pontificate and
recent statements indicate that this hope may not be misplaced. The future, your
Holiness said in November 2013, is in the respectful coexistence of diversity
and in the fundamental right to religious freedom in all its dimensions, and not
in muting the different voices of religion.
positive change in the Catholic Church is pinned on the Your Pontificate and
recent statements indicate that this hope may not be misplaced. The future, your
Holiness said in November 2013, is in the respectful coexistence of diversity
and in the fundamental right to religious freedom in all its dimensions, and not
in muting the different voices of religion.
This statement
makes eminent sense and would need to be implemented by all who presently do not
subscribe to a respectful coexistence of diversity in regard to religions.
However, I sense (wrongly maybe) that it is a plea for other religions to
respect Christianity, rather than a commitment by the Church to respect other
religions. To be precise, since Christians are occasionally persecuted in
Islamic countries, it seems to be an appeal to ‘live and let live’ between the
two biggest religions on earth.
makes eminent sense and would need to be implemented by all who presently do not
subscribe to a respectful coexistence of diversity in regard to religions.
However, I sense (wrongly maybe) that it is a plea for other religions to
respect Christianity, rather than a commitment by the Church to respect other
religions. To be precise, since Christians are occasionally persecuted in
Islamic countries, it seems to be an appeal to ‘live and let live’ between the
two biggest religions on earth.
Your Holiness is
aware that both, Christianity and Islam, claim to be the only true religion and
their God, respectively Allah alone is true. Both religions further hold that
all people on earth have to accept this claim and join their particular religion
to be saved and reach heaven or paradise. Both give a serious warning to those
who don’t join: they will land up eternally in hell. These claims of
exclusiveness are made without any evidence whatsoever, apart from the fact that
the claims contradict each other, as both cannot be true. They require blind
belief, and as blind, unreasonable belief is not natural for human beings, for
many centuries it was enforced with state power and indoctrinated right from
childhood with the fear of hell as the boogeyman.
aware that both, Christianity and Islam, claim to be the only true religion and
their God, respectively Allah alone is true. Both religions further hold that
all people on earth have to accept this claim and join their particular religion
to be saved and reach heaven or paradise. Both give a serious warning to those
who don’t join: they will land up eternally in hell. These claims of
exclusiveness are made without any evidence whatsoever, apart from the fact that
the claims contradict each other, as both cannot be true. They require blind
belief, and as blind, unreasonable belief is not natural for human beings, for
many centuries it was enforced with state power and indoctrinated right from
childhood with the fear of hell as the boogeyman.
May I ask Your
Holiness to ponder how the respectful coexistence of diversity and the
fundamental right to religious freedom is possible as long as these claims of
exclusiveness are in place? Were these claims originally made to gain political
power or were they made in the interest of the spiritual welfare of humanity?
And may I also ask whether Your Holiness personally believes in these
claims?
Holiness to ponder how the respectful coexistence of diversity and the
fundamental right to religious freedom is possible as long as these claims of
exclusiveness are in place? Were these claims originally made to gain political
power or were they made in the interest of the spiritual welfare of humanity?
And may I also ask whether Your Holiness personally believes in these
claims?
I trust that
privately, Your Holiness does not believe in them, as media reported your
statement that good atheists also will be redeemed. In other words, they won’t
go automatically to hell. However, the Vatican took pains to clarify that
Your Holiness did not mean it. Even my mother, 95 and a staunch Catholic all her
life, expressed dismay that a perfectly sensible statement by the Pope was
watered down.
privately, Your Holiness does not believe in them, as media reported your
statement that good atheists also will be redeemed. In other words, they won’t
go automatically to hell. However, the Vatican took pains to clarify that
Your Holiness did not mean it. Even my mother, 95 and a staunch Catholic all her
life, expressed dismay that a perfectly sensible statement by the Pope was
watered down.
Your Holiness may
feel compelled for worldly reasons to stick to the claim of exclusiveness as
dropping it would entail wrapping up all conversion attempts and in the process
lose power, wealth and influence. Further there may be fear that other Christian
denominations will not go along and will gain an advantage over the Catholic
Church. Still another worry may be that Islam will not drop the claim of
exclusiveness and will push aggressively for conversion.
feel compelled for worldly reasons to stick to the claim of exclusiveness as
dropping it would entail wrapping up all conversion attempts and in the process
lose power, wealth and influence. Further there may be fear that other Christian
denominations will not go along and will gain an advantage over the Catholic
Church. Still another worry may be that Islam will not drop the claim of
exclusiveness and will push aggressively for conversion.
However, the
Catholic Church was the first institution to put up this baseless claim, which
has brought unspeakable disaster upon humankind. From this claim the Church
derived not only the ‘right’, but the ‘duty’ to storm across the globe and
impose forcefully her ‘belief system’ – in Europe, in the Americas and in Africa and now in Asia. It was no doubt an ingenious ploy to claim that God
wants everyone to become Christian. . Mark Twain famously said, “Religion was
born when the first con-man met the first fool”. I would change it, “Dogmatic
religion was born when ….”.
Catholic Church was the first institution to put up this baseless claim, which
has brought unspeakable disaster upon humankind. From this claim the Church
derived not only the ‘right’, but the ‘duty’ to storm across the globe and
impose forcefully her ‘belief system’ – in Europe, in the Americas and in Africa and now in Asia. It was no doubt an ingenious ploy to claim that God
wants everyone to become Christian. . Mark Twain famously said, “Religion was
born when the first con-man met the first fool”. I would change it, “Dogmatic
religion was born when ….”.
Some centuries
later, Islam followed suit, claiming that Allah wants everyone to accept Islam,
and we all know the violent conflicts resulting from those unsubstantiated
claims. Since the Catholic Church started this disastrous trend, she needs to
reverse it. The welfare of humanity as a whole has to be the concern and not the
welfare of a religious institution. Hopefully Your Holiness has the courage to
make a real, clear change for the better and will not fall for hairsplitting
theological arguments, like ‘redemption is possible but not salvation’,
etc.
later, Islam followed suit, claiming that Allah wants everyone to accept Islam,
and we all know the violent conflicts resulting from those unsubstantiated
claims. Since the Catholic Church started this disastrous trend, she needs to
reverse it. The welfare of humanity as a whole has to be the concern and not the
welfare of a religious institution. Hopefully Your Holiness has the courage to
make a real, clear change for the better and will not fall for hairsplitting
theological arguments, like ‘redemption is possible but not salvation’,
etc.
Most Christians
especially in Europe don’t believe anymore in
unreasonable claims. The sad thing is that together with the dogmas, many reject
belief in God altogether. They have not learnt to listen to their conscience and
to enquire into truth, as the Church has played the role of the conscience- and
truth-keeper for too long. The consequences for our societies are there for
everyone to see.
especially in Europe don’t believe anymore in
unreasonable claims. The sad thing is that together with the dogmas, many reject
belief in God altogether. They have not learnt to listen to their conscience and
to enquire into truth, as the Church has played the role of the conscience- and
truth-keeper for too long. The consequences for our societies are there for
everyone to see.
However, many
Christians do start pondering and believe in a ‘great power’, but not in the
Christian God. For example, when I asked some fifty Christians in
Germany whether they believe that
Hindus who heard about Jesus Christ, but do not convert, will go to hell, nobody
said yes. Even a priest said no. And not a single German I met was in favour of
missionary activity in India. Yet Pope John Paul II declared
in India the intention of the Church to plant the cross in Asia in the new
millennium and considered India as a field for a rich harvest, which goes
completely against ‘respectful coexistence’.
Christians do start pondering and believe in a ‘great power’, but not in the
Christian God. For example, when I asked some fifty Christians in
Germany whether they believe that
Hindus who heard about Jesus Christ, but do not convert, will go to hell, nobody
said yes. Even a priest said no. And not a single German I met was in favour of
missionary activity in India. Yet Pope John Paul II declared
in India the intention of the Church to plant the cross in Asia in the new
millennium and considered India as a field for a rich harvest, which goes
completely against ‘respectful coexistence’.
I live in
India since 33 years and can
assert with full confidence that India has no need of Christian
missionaries, and yet huge sums of money are being pumped in to lure converts
with material benefits and to build churches. I am aware that Your Holiness is
responsible only for Catholics and not for the myriad of other Christian
denominations that prey on poor Hindus, but if the Catholic Church made a start
of truly respecting Hindus, it would have a big impact.
India since 33 years and can
assert with full confidence that India has no need of Christian
missionaries, and yet huge sums of money are being pumped in to lure converts
with material benefits and to build churches. I am aware that Your Holiness is
responsible only for Catholics and not for the myriad of other Christian
denominations that prey on poor Hindus, but if the Catholic Church made a start
of truly respecting Hindus, it would have a big impact.
Maybe Your
Holiness is under the impression that Hinduism is a depraved religion and Hindus
would do well to accept the Christian God instead of their multiple gods. Such
an impression would be completely wrong. There is no other religion that is
–unjustly – denigrated as badly as Hinduism. Sorry to say that Christian
(including Catholic) missionaries are in the forefront of this vilification
campaign. Few people in the west know how profound India’s ancient
tradition is. A solid philosophical basis for our existence and helpful tenets
for a fulfilling, meaningful life had been known in India long
before ‘religions’, as we know them today, came into being. The only addition
Christianity brought in anew, are unverifiable dogmas that cannot possibly have
a bearing on the absolute Truth. Can an event in history impact the absolute
Truth? Will Truth make a distinction between people who are baptized and those
who are not? “There is no salvation outside the Church” is, and I may be excused
for using strong language, ridiculous.
Holiness is under the impression that Hinduism is a depraved religion and Hindus
would do well to accept the Christian God instead of their multiple gods. Such
an impression would be completely wrong. There is no other religion that is
–unjustly – denigrated as badly as Hinduism. Sorry to say that Christian
(including Catholic) missionaries are in the forefront of this vilification
campaign. Few people in the west know how profound India’s ancient
tradition is. A solid philosophical basis for our existence and helpful tenets
for a fulfilling, meaningful life had been known in India long
before ‘religions’, as we know them today, came into being. The only addition
Christianity brought in anew, are unverifiable dogmas that cannot possibly have
a bearing on the absolute Truth. Can an event in history impact the absolute
Truth? Will Truth make a distinction between people who are baptized and those
who are not? “There is no salvation outside the Church” is, and I may be excused
for using strong language, ridiculous.
The Indian rishis
had discovered ages ago that an all-pervading Presence is at the core of this
universe, indescribable, but best described as absolute consciousness. Further,
the Hindu law of karma preceded the Christian dictum “as you sow so you reap’. A
Council stopped Christians from believing in rebirth which would explain many
riddles that trouble them, for example why there is great injustice already at
birth? The advantage of having a perfect person as a friend and guide on the
spiritual path was known in India, but till some 2000 years ago nobody
claimed that ‘only’ Krishna or ‘only’ Ram or
‘only’ Buddha can lead to salvation and that whoever does not believe it, goes
to hell. “Truth is One, the wise call it by many names”, the Indian rishis
declared and listed different names of gods. That was at a time, when
Christianity was nowhere in sight. Surely they would have included ‘God’ as
another name and Jesus as an avatar, not expecting to be backstabbed by
followers of “God” declaring: “Truth is one and must be called only by one name
and is fully revealed only in one book.”
had discovered ages ago that an all-pervading Presence is at the core of this
universe, indescribable, but best described as absolute consciousness. Further,
the Hindu law of karma preceded the Christian dictum “as you sow so you reap’. A
Council stopped Christians from believing in rebirth which would explain many
riddles that trouble them, for example why there is great injustice already at
birth? The advantage of having a perfect person as a friend and guide on the
spiritual path was known in India, but till some 2000 years ago nobody
claimed that ‘only’ Krishna or ‘only’ Ram or
‘only’ Buddha can lead to salvation and that whoever does not believe it, goes
to hell. “Truth is One, the wise call it by many names”, the Indian rishis
declared and listed different names of gods. That was at a time, when
Christianity was nowhere in sight. Surely they would have included ‘God’ as
another name and Jesus as an avatar, not expecting to be backstabbed by
followers of “God” declaring: “Truth is one and must be called only by one name
and is fully revealed only in one book.”
The multiple gods
in Hinduism are personified powers that help to access the formless, nameless
Presence that is in all of us. Christians in India are told
that Hindu gods are devils. At the same time, Christianity tries to revive
(possibly inspired by Hinduism) belief in angels, as devotion for the Invisible
is easier by focusing on images.
in Hinduism are personified powers that help to access the formless, nameless
Presence that is in all of us. Christians in India are told
that Hindu gods are devils. At the same time, Christianity tries to revive
(possibly inspired by Hinduism) belief in angels, as devotion for the Invisible
is easier by focusing on images.
Hinduism is not a
belief system. It is a knowledge system. It is a genuine enquiry into what is
true about us and the world. Hindus are not required to believe anything that
does not make sense and can never be verified. There is complete freedom. Yes,
most believe in rebirth, which makes sense. Most believe in an all pervading
Brahman (many other names are in use) that is also in humans. Most believe that
this divine essence can be experienced in oneself, if the person purifies
herself by certain disciplines coupled with devotion. This belief is verifiable.
It is not blind. There were many Rishis who realized their oneness with Brahman.
In Christianity, too, there were mystics who experienced oneness with the Divine
like Meister Eckhart did. Sadly, he was excommunicated by the Church. Why is the
Church resisting scientific insight that there is some mystery essence in
everything? And why is it difficult to accept that in the long, long history of
humanity, there were several, not only one, outstanding personalities who showed
the way to the truth?
belief system. It is a knowledge system. It is a genuine enquiry into what is
true about us and the world. Hindus are not required to believe anything that
does not make sense and can never be verified. There is complete freedom. Yes,
most believe in rebirth, which makes sense. Most believe in an all pervading
Brahman (many other names are in use) that is also in humans. Most believe that
this divine essence can be experienced in oneself, if the person purifies
herself by certain disciplines coupled with devotion. This belief is verifiable.
It is not blind. There were many Rishis who realized their oneness with Brahman.
In Christianity, too, there were mystics who experienced oneness with the Divine
like Meister Eckhart did. Sadly, he was excommunicated by the Church. Why is the
Church resisting scientific insight that there is some mystery essence in
everything? And why is it difficult to accept that in the long, long history of
humanity, there were several, not only one, outstanding personalities who showed
the way to the truth?
Holy Father, I
request you in all sincerity to be such an outstanding personality who guides
his followers on a path of expansion, and does not straight-jacket them into an
unbelievable belief system, which among others demands converting Hindus to
Christianity. Your Holiness is venerated as the representative of the Highest
Power in this universe by over a billion of Catholics. Many of your predecessors
were not worthy of this veneration. Utmost truthfulness and integrity are
required. Calculations about worldly power must not come in the way. The
Catholic Church surely would benefit, not lose out, if it honors Truth and gives
up its claim that there is no salvation outside the Church. Truth cannot be
cheated; neither can it be contained in a book. Truth is what we basically are.
Hindus, whose religion is universal and all-encompassing, respect diverse
traditions. They are one of the most cultured, gentle and peace-loving people on
earth who live and let live, unless greatly provoked.
request you in all sincerity to be such an outstanding personality who guides
his followers on a path of expansion, and does not straight-jacket them into an
unbelievable belief system, which among others demands converting Hindus to
Christianity. Your Holiness is venerated as the representative of the Highest
Power in this universe by over a billion of Catholics. Many of your predecessors
were not worthy of this veneration. Utmost truthfulness and integrity are
required. Calculations about worldly power must not come in the way. The
Catholic Church surely would benefit, not lose out, if it honors Truth and gives
up its claim that there is no salvation outside the Church. Truth cannot be
cheated; neither can it be contained in a book. Truth is what we basically are.
Hindus, whose religion is universal and all-encompassing, respect diverse
traditions. They are one of the most cultured, gentle and peace-loving people on
earth who live and let live, unless greatly provoked.
Holy Father, if
you are serious about respecting other religions, the claim of exclusiveness
must be scrapped and Hindus who have given to the world a deep philosophy and a
great culture, must be respected. Many of us look forward to hearing truly good
news from the Catholic Church under your stewardship. The main issue that
plagues the Church is not whether women should be priests or whether divorcees
can take Holy Communion .The main issue is the unfounded claim of exclusiveness
regarding ‘salvation’. It divides humanity into us who are right and saved,
versus them who are wrong and damned. Kindly drop this harmful claim and make
your Pontificate truly memorable and beneficial for all humanity.
you are serious about respecting other religions, the claim of exclusiveness
must be scrapped and Hindus who have given to the world a deep philosophy and a
great culture, must be respected. Many of us look forward to hearing truly good
news from the Catholic Church under your stewardship. The main issue that
plagues the Church is not whether women should be priests or whether divorcees
can take Holy Communion .The main issue is the unfounded claim of exclusiveness
regarding ‘salvation’. It divides humanity into us who are right and saved,
versus them who are wrong and damned. Kindly drop this harmful claim and make
your Pontificate truly memorable and beneficial for all humanity.
Yours
Sincerely
Sincerely
Maria
Wirth
Wirth
Posted as
registered letter to Pope Francis on 10th December 2013 from Puducherry, India
registered letter to Pope Francis on 10th December 2013 from Puducherry, India